"Two books written by evangelicals were the two precipitating factors; one was published in the United Kingdom, and the other in America. In The Lost Message of Jesus, widely known British evangelical Steve Chalke opposed PSA. His inflammatory statement that PSA was a form of "cosmic child" abuse caused concern and open controversy among other British evangelicals. In the U.S., Joel Green and Mark D. Baker recently authored "Recovering the Scandal of the Cross," published by InterVarsity Press. Green and Baker's thesis is that the New Testament displays a rich array of interpretations of the cross. Some have called their view the "kaleidoscope atonement." Their burden is to show that a monopoly exists on the view of the atonement (PSA) and that there actually are many other biblical metaphors that can enable us to communicate the cross in fresh ways to our postmodern culture. Green and Baker are not content to place PSA in the mix of cross metaphors. They are suggesting that PSA is based on a mistaken concept of God's wrath. They see PSA as promoting a "divisive child abuse model of the atonement" (p. 181). Green is a professor at Fuller Seminary, and Baker, at Biblical Seminary. These authors and a growing list of evangelicals who endorse them represent voices of dissent from a long strain of mainline evangelicals. They assert that PSA is unbecoming of a God of love, and not an adequate expression of the biblical view."
That's from an excellent article which you can find here:
The Atonement Wars
There is no Substitute for Substitution
by Orrel Steincamp
http://www.cicministry.org/scholarly/sch009.htm
It's a great find for anyone dealing with this new version of the atonement which is rapidly finding its way into Bible seminaries and churches.
The atonement war is on. If you love the truth, pick up your armor.
Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. Ephesians 6:13
6 comments:
The true message of the atonement (penal substitutionary atonement) is summed up in Romans 3:25a.
"For God sent Jesus to take the punishment for our sins and to satisfy God's anger against us. We are made right with God when we believe that Jesus shed his blood, sacrificing his life for us."
In my opinion, this is pretty clear. I don't see a lot of wiggle room for a variety of "interpretations."
That's why they have to use so many fancy words to make it sound authentic.
So sad they missed the point of the atonement, that God loves us so much that He provides a way for our sins to be washed away. It is only through His sacrifice that we can approach a Holy and Righteous God. What a precious gift to us!
Do you think that if people really don't understand the gravity of the atonement, then they don't really understand the gravity of their own sin?
I'm inclined to think that they miss the point of how Gracious God actually is!
this site is such a joke..
Perhaps you'd like to share the joke Matt so that we can all have a refreshing laugh.
Post a Comment